Verbal conflicts often arise from factual conflicts where differences of opinion are linked to differences of opinion on facts, not on importance. If anyone thinks That Sydney is the capital of Australia and others disagree, the disagreement is objective. There are two main ways to resolve a purely verbal quarrel when talking about the different meanings of a key term. First, the various parties may not agree on the use of the term. For example, Teachers A and B might agree that they have provided two different pre-quote definitions of “best student,” and that both are legitimate, and they may agree that Cindy is the best student under one interpretation and that Betty is the best student among another interpretation. So who`s right and who`s wrong? In a way, both teachers are right because they seem to be working with two different definitions of “best students.” For Teacher A, the best student is the one with the highest average score. For Teacher B, the best student is someone with the highest number of A grades. Clearly, the student who meets the first definition should not be the same as the student who meets the second definition. This is an example of a purely verbal confrontation where the obvious disagreement is not due to a disagreement on the facts, but to a different understanding of the meaning of a key concept or concept.
However, there are situations in which the parties involved must choose a particular interpretation. For example, there may be only one prize to be awarded to the best student, so it is necessary to choose between the two definitions to decide whether Cindy or Betty should receive the award. This is therefore the second way to resolve a verbal dispute with two definitions – we opt for a precise definition by looking very carefully at the function it should serve. If, in the example on the exam, you have to choose between teacher definitions A and B, which you will choose the definition of and why? Can you give your own examples of factual and verbal conflicts? A: I don`t think there`s a God. B: Wrong, everyone believes in God, because you have to believe in something. A: Life begins at conception when a proper genetic definition of a new organism is formed. B: Such a life is not human, because humanity is the ability to think and feel. A: C`mon, you have to believe that the conspiracy took place or that it didn`t happen. B: No, actually, I don`t believe at all about it. It may have happened, but I do not refuse it or I do not accept it.
Discovery is the ability to be confused by simple things. a: I don`t think so, I know. b: I don`t think you know that either. A: Men were created in the image of God. B: God does not exist, so this cannot be true. A: Don`t ask them if you should accept this job or not, make your own decision. B: I decide my own decision – I decided to ask them what to do. A: There is no “I” in the team! B: There`s “Win.” A: The capital of Korea is Seoul. B: You`re wrong. The capital of Korea is Pyongyang.
Jury #3: These are the children they are today. When I was a child, I called my father “Sir.” It`s true. “Sir.” Does a child call his father what he calls it more? Jury #8: Fathers no longer seem to think it`s important. – From the movie 12 Angry Men.